logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.10.23 2018고단281
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 on June 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant’s wife C that “the Defendant is detained by the Defendant”; and (b) committed assault, on the same day, the police officers sent to the E box located in the Si/Y of Jeong-Eup along with C in order to listen to the situation of the instant case; (c) sought the complaint with C; and (d) sought the complaint as a police box at around 21:05 on the same day; (d) took a bath for the police officers in the said box; and (e) b) spit down the Defendant’s face of slopeF that solicits the Defendant to return home, and pushed the F’s chest on his body.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. According to the sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case was committed in the area of aggravated punishment (a period of one year to four years, and a special sentencing factor: a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report from the Defendant’s wife C and received a report from the Defendant’s wife C in order to listen to the circumstances of the case, the police officer, who was dispatched as a police box with C, was found to have obstructed the performance of duties of the police officer at the place where the police officer was found to have been at the place of the police box with C, with a view to listening to the circumstances of the case.

The term "brination" means a brination of a police officer F's face, such as spitation of spitation of the f's face, and spiting of the chest with his body, which is not good in light of the details and methods of violence, patterns, assault, and objects of violence.

From 1981 to 190, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment three times or more with prison labor due to the crime of robbery and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won or more due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 1993.

arrow