beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 16, 2017, at around 07:40, the Defendant: (a) reported that “D” was operated by the Defendant in Busan Jin-gu, Busan; and (b) received a report that “the Defendant would kill gas,” and sent a risk to the life, body, etc. of the above people, by releasing gas from a valve on the table of the police officers and firemen, including the border F belonging to the Busan Jin-gu, Police Station E-gu, Busan, where many police officers and firemen waiting outside of the zone while waiting, including D.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of each investigation report (not later than 8 times a year), each photograph, and the details of each report to statutes;
1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)
1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing has been repeated for a favorable reason):
1. Scope of punishment: Imprisonment with labor for up to five years;
2. The sentencing criteria are not set separately for the crimes of this case, for which the sentencing criteria are not set.
The defendant, without any particular reason, released gas by opening a valve in his operation.
This is a very dangerous act that may cause damage to life, body, and property that is difficult to recover from police officers, firemen, and neighboring residents, in receipt of a report, and the nature of the crime is not easy.
The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of probation.
However, the defendant does not have the same criminal records.
The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a drunken state.
The instant crime did not lead to an accident, such as gas explosion.
It seems that the defendant did not commit the crime of this case with the intention or purpose to inflict damage on others.
The defendant reflects his wrongness.
. The above.