Text
1. A traffic accident that occurred on July 19, 2018 on the road near the entrance of the 2nd village of North Korean history, if the person was in Busan Metropolitan City at around 20:40.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement on D tourist buses (hereinafter “instant buses”) with C.
나. E은 2018. 7. 19. 20:40경 이 사건 버스를 운전하여 경산시 자인면 북사2리 마을입구의 남촌네거리에서 자인네거리 방면으로 1차로를 운행하고 있었는데, 이 사건 버스 전방에서 피고가 그 소유의 F 화물트럭(이하 ‘이 사건 트럭’이라 한다)을 운전하여 이 사건 버스와 같은 방향으로 비상등을 켠 채 갓길과 2차선을 물고 진행하던 중 사고장소에 이르러 갑자기 1차선으로 차선을 변경하여 이 사건 버스의 우측 앞 부분과 이 사건 트럭의 운전석 부분이 충돌하는 사고가 발생하였다
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
The Defendant suffered injury, such as the scarcity scarcity and other injury to the traumatic scarcity and other details, the impairment of the head, the brain scarcity and the alley of other two structural layers without open address.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the parties' arguments
A. The Plaintiff’s instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s gross negligence, such as the Defendant’s illegal U.S., and E, a bus driver of the instant case, could not have predicted that the Defendant attempted a sudden U.S. to attempt a sudden U.S. at the vicinity of the accident site, which was not the permission point for U.S., and
Therefore, the Plaintiff, a mutual aid business entity of the bus of this case, is not liable for damages suffered by the Defendant due to the accident of this case.
B. The accident of this case occurred between the defendant's negligence and the negligence of E, which is the driver of the bus of this case. Thus, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant for the damage caused by the accident of this case as the mutual aid business operator of the bus of this case.
3. Determination
A. Relevant legal principles.