logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고정95
가축분뇨의관리및이용에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. A person who intends to install a livestock breeding facility with a size of at least 100 square meters but less than 900 square meters, which is a summary of the facts charged, shall file a report thereon with the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu, and shall not raise livestock using a waste-generating facility not reported;

Nevertheless, around June 21, 2013, in the Yannam-gun C, a lawsuit was raised using a stable with a size of 270 square meters, which is an emission facility not reported to the competent authority.

2. Determination

A. Article 50 subparag. 3 of the Act on the Management and Use of Livestock Excreta (hereinafter “the Livestock Excreta Act”) provides that “A person who installs a waste-generating facility or raises livestock using the waste-generating facility without reporting in violation of Article 11(3) or by filing a false report in violation of Article 11(3).” Article 11(3) of the same Act provides that “A person who intends to install a waste-generating facility above the scale prescribed by Presidential Decree, among discharge facilities not subject to permission under paragraph (1), shall file a report with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment.” The same shall also apply to an alteration of reported matters. A person subject to reporting under Articles 50 subparag. 3 and 11(3) of the same Act refers to a person who intends to install a waste-generating facility above the scale prescribed by Presidential Decree, or a person who intends to alter the reported matters, even if the person who installed the waste-generating facility was not subject to reporting at the time of the installation, he/she shall not be deemed a person subject to report.”

(See Supreme Court Decision 2000Do5895, Mar. 9, 2001). In addition, penal provisions should be interpreted and applied strictly in accordance with the language and text.

arrow