2010Gohap551 Violation of the Political Funds Act

1 . 임 ( 42년생 , 남 ) , ♤♤ 전자재료 ( 주 ) 대표이사

Housing Yangcheon-gu Seoul

Reference domicile Daegu

2. Gamb○○ (53-years, remaining) and electronic materials shocked (jum).

Residential Gangwon

reference domicile Gyeong-nam

Maximum Country of Origin

변호사 김◆◆ ( 피고인 모두를 위한 국선 )

February 16, 201

Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million and by a fine of KRW 1 million, respectively.

In the event that the Defendants fail to pay each of the above fines, the period calculated by converting each of the 50,000 won into one day;

shall be confined respectively in the old house.

To order the Defendants to pay an amount of money equivalent to the above fines.

Criminal facts

No one shall contribute any political fund under the name of another person or under a family name, any support fund that a supporter is entitled to contribute to a supporters' association shall not exceed 20 million won a year, and the limit of annual contributions to a single supporters' association shall not exceed 5 million won a year, in cases of a supporters' association for the head of a local government.

피고인 임Q & 은 ♤ 전자재료 주식회사 대표이사 , 피고인 박는 위 회사 상무이 사로서 피고인 임 은 2010 . 6 . 2 . 실시되는 제5회 전국동시지방선거 경기도지사 후 보자로 출마한 김 * * 후보자에게 정치자금을 후원하고자 하였으나 , 후원인이 하나의 후원회에 기부할 수 있는 후원금 한도액이 500만 원인 것을 알고 회사 직원 명의를 빌 려 후원금 한도액을 초과하여 정치자금을 기부하기로 마음먹었다 .

On May 24, 2010, Defendant Q&A granted KRW 25 million in cash to Defendant ParkO in the president office of the OO-dong Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., Ltd. at OO-si, and ordered the said employees to contribute support payments under the Political Funds Act *** to the candidate’s supporters’ association. Defendant Park Park consented to this, and thereafter, Defendant Park conspired to contribute political funds in the name of the head of the material team, CC, △△△△, etc. of the said head of the business management team.

피고인 박○○는 2010 . 5 . 25 . 10 : 40경 ○○시 ○○동 전자재료 주식회사 내 피 고인 박아의 사무실에서 인터넷을 이용하여 피고인 박아와 피고인 박O의 친구 구 김88 명의로 김 * * 후보자 후원회 예금계좌에 1 , 000만 원을 이체하고 , 같은 날 14 : 30경 ○○시 ○○동 기업은행 ○○단지지점에서 위 회사 자금담당 과장 박▦▦으로 하여금 이CC , 한△△ , 박▦▦ 명의로 각 500만 원씩 합계 1 , 500만 원을 김 * * 후보 자 후원회 예금계좌에 입금하도록 하였다 .

이로써 피고인들은 공모하여 김米米 후보자 후원회에 정치자금 2 , 500만 원을 기부 하여 타인 명의로 정치자금을 기부함과 동시에 후원인의 기부한도를 초과하여 후원금 을 기부하였다 .

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1 . 박▦▦에 대한 각 경찰 진술조서

1. Kim 388, each written statement of thisCC

1. Details of each payment made from each support fund (the 15th, 16th, the investigation records);

1. A list of donors of support payments (in-depth 98 pages of investigation records);

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of criminal facts;

Articles 45(2)2 and 11(1) of the Political Funds Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

of the Political Funds Act, each of the provisions of section 45(2)2 and section 11(2)2 of the Political Funds Act,

Article 30 (Violation of Restriction on Annual Contributions by One Supporters's Association) Article 48 of the Political Funds Act

Subparagraph 3, Article 2(5), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the fact of, and inclusive, the contribution of political funds under the name of another person)

1. Commercial competition;

Articles 40 and 50 of each Criminal Code (Article 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code) (Article 50 of the Criminal Code shall also apply to annual contributions by

(2) The punishment provided for the violation of the Political Funds Act due to such violation

1. Selection of punishment;

Selection of each fine

1. Detention in a workhouse,

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code

1. Order of provisional payment;

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reasons for sentencing

The crime of this case is likely to seriously undermine the purpose of legislation of the Political Fund Act with the aim of contributing to the sound development of democratic politics by guaranteeing the adequate provision of political funds and preventing any malpractice related to political funds, and thus, the Defendants should be held liable for the corresponding liability.

However, there is no same criminal power for the Defendants, and there is no later than later mispercing and pening them. In particular, in the case of Defendant GambO, the Defendants did not directly participate in the crime, but were dynamicly involved in the crime according to the direction of Defendant Gamb, a representative of the head of the office who is in office, under the direction of Defendant B B, who is the representative of the head of the office in office, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the argument of this case, the punishment is determined

Judges of the presiding judge;

Judges Oral Assistance

Judges Equitable