The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 21, 2013, the Defendant, at the E main store operated by the victim D with the 3th floor in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu, as an employee on August 21, 2013, entered the said main room A, and collected KRW 1,800,000 of cash, which was owned by the victim D, within the victim D’s soft-type block block, and entered the room behind the said main store, and then cut off the envelope with the victim F’s 60,000 cash, which is 60,000 won owned by the victim F, from the back main room.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction should be based on evidence with probative value, which makes it possible for a judge to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Unless there is such proof, the conviction cannot be judged as guilty even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do8675, Mar. 9, 2006). It is the ideology of our criminal law that it is impossible to create a person with no doubt even if 10 criminal offenders are placed.

In this case where the defendant consistently denies the crime of theft from investigative agency to this court, various circumstances are recognized, such as the CCTV images entering the studio where the defendant was stolen, are the only direct evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case, and the defendant was present at the first place and did not work from the next day, and the defendant was written his name. At the time of this case, two employees of the above studio were F and the defendant, and F were lost the monthly salary of F kept in the room where the employees want to go to go to clothes, and F did not respond to the change of the phone number after a weak month, and there are various circumstances such as D, F, and G.