1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Comprehensively taking account of the whole purport of the pleadings as indicated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the plaintiff concluded a lease deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 240,000 (payment on the last day of each month) with respect to the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the building of this case") on January 11, 2013, and the lease contract (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case") for the period from January 30, 2013 to December 24, 2013. The plaintiff terminated the lease contract of this case by service of the complaint of this case on August 31, 2015 on the ground that the signal Co., Ltd. did not pay KRW 20,640,000,000 as of August 31, 2015, the plaintiff can be acknowledged as the administrator of this case's summary signal service to the manager of this case on October 7, 2015.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was terminated on October 7, 2015 on the ground of the rent of the signal ennae.

However, since the commencement of rehabilitation procedures does not affect the right to retrieve any property that does not belong to the debtor from the debtor (Article 70 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act), the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff by the restoration following the termination of the lease contract of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.