1. On the basis of the executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Daejeon District Court 2015 tea 9205 against Nonparty B.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged as comprehensively considering the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, namely, the plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the Daejeon-gu, Seo-gu, 108 Dong 903, which had movable properties listed in Nos. 1 through 9 (hereinafter "the movable of this case") in the attached seizure list on Jan. 21, 2008, and since the transfer of the above apartment after January 29, 2008, and the fact that the movable of this case had been residing in this place until now after the transfer of the above apartment, and the fact that the movable of this case, such as cooling and washing machines, can be acknowledged as the fact that the movable of this case is owned by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the execution of the seizure of the case in this court 2015No4032 against the movables Nos. 1 through 9 in the attached list of attachment should be denied, and the plaintiff's claim in this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.