logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.07.15 2015고단572
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-man car.

On January 16:35, 2015, the Defendant driving the said car, and driving the car at a eroding line in Busan-gun, the iron-line in Busan-gun, and driving the car at an insular speed from the erode to the erode of the office if the steel-line is left at an insular speed. In such a case, the Defendant was a road bend to the right-hand side where the central line of yellow-ray is installed. Therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely drive the car and prevent accidents by safely keeping the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the part of the victim C(61 years old) driving the victim C(61 years old) driving with the front part of the front part of the driver's vehicle in the front part of the front part of the driver's vehicle, which was driven by the driver of the central line, in the front part of the iron-line office.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim C, the victim E (the 63 years old), the victim F (the 65 years old), and the victim G (the 67 years old) in terms of light fluoral dynasium, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, the injury of the fluoral dynasium, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks to the victim H (the 67 years old), the injury of the fluoral dynasium, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks to the victim I(the 63 years old), and the injury of the fluoral dynasium, etc. requiring treatment for about four weeks to the victim J (the fluor, the 58 years old) who was aboard the fluoral dynasium

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow