1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 2016, the Plaintiff’s spouse (CB; hereinafter “the deceased”) suffered an accident that D was faced with a bus and a sub-road in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant construction”) around 14:50 on October 8, 2016, when the Plaintiff’s spouse was under construction for the first floor toilet te (hereinafter “instant construction”) located in the housing located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant company”) with the total construction cost of KRW 3.6 million and ordered the instant company E (hereinafter “instant company”).

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant traffic accident”). The Deceased, immediately after being sent to an emergency room at a medical college Sybane hospital at the school of the next generation, was killed at around 18:21 on the same day.

The death diagnosis report on the deceased is written by the direct deathist, the middle line event's closure, and the pre-stigious damage.

B. On December 19, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, on March 10, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to pay survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the following grounds.

In order to determine whether the instant construction work is a mandatorily applied workplace under Article 6 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”), the head of Korea’s branch requested whether the construction site is subject to compulsory application. The above construction site received a reply that the total construction cost is less than KRW 20,000,00, and the deceased was the person in charge of the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at 09:0,00, on the day of the accident, he/she confirmed the fact that necessary construction materials at H were purchased at H two times and returned to the site at the time of the accident. However, at the time of the accident, the deceased claimed that there was no receipt or statement that purchased the materials at the time of the accident, and the deceased’s business trip to Seoul City.