logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.06 2015나40196
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance following the last day of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The addition;

C. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment added at the trial of the political party are as follows: ① The notarial deed of this case is not prepared by the plaintiff for the payment of D debts, but is not prepared for the payment of D debts, and the defendant also knew that the preparation of the notarial deed of this case constitutes a notarial deed of this case is not the plaintiff's intention; ② although the defendant knows the process of issuing the notarial deed of this case and the plaintiff's intention, there is no practical reason to exercise his rights on the notarial deed of this case, enforcement on the notarial deed of this case is invalid as it constitutes abuse of rights. However, under the circumstances that the defendant's lending of KRW 50 million is not possible, the notarial deed of this case is prepared by the defendant for the payment of KRW 50 million from the defendant, and even if the defendant actually received the notarial deed of this case from the plaintiff, the notarial deed of this case is not prepared as the notarial deed of this case's notarial deed of this case, it is not prepared as the plaintiff's notarial deed of this case.

arrow