1. On November 24, 2014, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 22, 2006, the Plaintiff entered and worked in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Stimex”) and was selected in the project “Burgo 2 project” (hereinafter “instant project”), which is an employee visa management program supervised by the Nonparty Company from October 2, 2014, and led the Nonparty Company to conduct a campaign to reduce the body at a place designated by the Nonparty Company.

B. On October 21, 2014, around 17:40, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the instant injury” on the half-month of the direction of the snife (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the occurrence of an accident involving kneeing the left side of knee while kneing knife in accordance with the instant project at port and north-gu (hereinafter “C”).

C. On November 6, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the instant accident constituted an occupational accident, and the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on November 24, 2014 on the ground that “it is difficult to see that the act of movement within the healthcare center according to the instant project is under the control and management of the business owner.”

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion occurred while being selected as a project object under the supervision of the Nonparty Company and being engaged in an election campaign at a place (C) designated on the part of the Company. This is a disaster that occurred when the Plaintiff was controlled by the company, not by the Plaintiff’s subjective judgment and program, but by the company’s management, in the selection of sports facilities and sports hours. Thus, it should be recognized as an occupational accident.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

(c) Determination 1 is being engaged in events or meetings other than companies that are not generally defined as those that are ordinarily bound to engage in trade by a labor contract.