beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.
2. After filing an appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant operated a real estate brokerage office under the trade name that is F real estate in Pyeongtaek-gun E in Gyeonggi-do.
During the operation of the above real estate brokerage office, the defendant registered the co-defendant C of the first instance court and the co-defendant D of the first instance court, which had been audited by the above company, as a broker assistant, at the time from May 1, 2007 to February 12, 2008.
B. On June 1, 2007, H entered into a land sale contract with D to purchase the land amounting to KRW 180,000,000 from D (hereinafter “instant sale contract”) with D, in the name of J, via his agent, KRW 742 square meters of forest land (hereinafter “instant land”). As stipulated in the instant sale contract, H paid KRW 20,000,000 as the down payment was made to each stock company on June 4, 2007 at the time of entering into the contract, as stipulated in the instant sale contract.
C. However, the instant land is not transferred to H according to the instant sales contract, but its ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of K on June 25, 2007.
Accordingly, C returned 50 million won to H around October 2007, and on February 14, 2008, C prepared and sent to H a written confirmation of the following contents:
(2) On June 1, 2007, the confirmation document of this case (hereinafter “the confirmation document of this case”). The confirmation document of this case (hereinafter “the confirmation document of this case”). The above amount was promised to return the above amount by no later than November 28, 2007, as the contract of sale of land with L on June 1, 2007 and the promise made on October 31, 2007 with L to return the total amount of KRW 10 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won was paid by November 28, 2007, but the remaining amount was not paid by no later than March 20, 2008, it was bound to return the above amount, and if not performed it, it was bound to bear all civil and criminal responsibilities.
February 14, 2008 C
E. H on September 24, 2014, caused the Plaintiff’s nonperformance of the instant sales contract to the Defendant.