1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s basic facts are those who were enrolled in the G church located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council (hereinafter “instant church”) from December 31, 2008 to December 2017, and the Defendants are not in dispute between the parties, or are recognized by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire arguments.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that: (a) the Defendants posted the writing in the separate sheet in the same manner as indicated in the same list; and (b) Defendant B, around August 14, 2016, at around 14:00, the Plaintiff was obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff, for the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s words, “Woo far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far.

Defamation, which is a tort under the Civil Act, refers to an act that infringes on a social objective evaluation of personal values, such as a person’s character, morals, reputation, and credit, and thus, an expressive act explicitly expressing a fact to the extent that it may infringe on another person’s social evaluation, as well as a defamation. However, purely expressing an opinion is not likely to infringe on another person’s reputation. However, there is no room for a pure expression of opinion to infringe on another person’s subjective reputation, and simply engaging in an expressive act that infringes on

Defamation is not established solely on the grounds that an expression of critical opinion affecting social assessment or that an expression of opinion was made (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2005Da75736, Feb. 14, 2008; 2005Da65494, Apr. 9, 2009). Meanwhile, the form and content of expressive act is insulting and insulting.