Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a BM5 vehicle.

On December 23, 2013, at around 18:05 on December 23, 2013, the Defendant proceeded one lane in accordance with the new subparagraph with the distance from the center side located in the same Dong as the speed of about 4-50 kilometers at a speed of about a speed of 4-50 kilometers.

At that time, there is a crosswalk installed on the front side of the vehicle, so there is a pedestrian, etc., so if there is a pedestrian, etc., to reduce the speed, and if there is a duty of care to see well the right and the right and the right of the road, it was negligent in neglecting the duty of care to see whether or not there is a person, but neglecting the duty of care to see, thereby neglecting to see the victim C (n, 67 years old) who has dried the crosswalk from the right and right side of the vehicle at that time, and the victim C (n, 67 years old) who has dried the crosswalk from the right side of the

Ultimately, the defendant's occupational negligence caused the death of the victim due to brain pressure, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the provisional payment order reveals that the occurrence of a serious consequence of the death of the victim due to the instant traffic accident. However, the instant accident occurred in the course of the instant accident without confirming the progress of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle at night, and without confirming the progress of the vehicle by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle at night, and is considerably heavy for the victim’s negligence, the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, the primary offender, the primary offender, and the Defendant raises two undergraduate students under the name of the second degree of disability with excessive overlap.