logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.07.01 2013고단3871
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2013 Highest 3871] The Defendant is a person who operates a multilateral bank with the trade name of “Dda” in Gyeonggi-gun C.

1. On July 5, 2012, the Defendant was obligated to pay KRW 10 million monthly interest of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, except for the total amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, did not own any property; (b) on the other hand, the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay the same even if she borrowed money from other persons.

Nevertheless, around July 5, 2012, the defendant, who was absent, made a false statement to the victim E, who was a guest at the above multilateral level, that "I will pay 10,000 won per day if I would have to do so, but will have to pay 5,000 won every day if I would have lent 5,000,000 won to I would have to do so." The defendant received money from the victim to the head of the Tong (Account Number:F) opened in the name of the defendant as a loan.

2. Forgery of private documents, uttering of private documents, and fraud on July 20, 2012;

A. The Defendant, while accepting the above multiples of KRW 5 million as security deposit and KRW 25 million as security deposit, did not mean that he invested KRW 30 million in Pyeongtaek E, and thus, he believed that he believed it as such, he did not borrow money, as security deposit is the cause of KRW 30 million.

On July 19, 2012, the Defendant, at the inner room of the above "Dda" room of the door door door room of the Defendant, made a scambial-type GDC room of the Gyeonggi-do in the location of the Defendant, using a scambial-type fladial-gun, Gyeonggi-do in the deposit column, “Tcheoncheon-do (30,000,000),” “B” in the lease term column, and “H” in the lessor’s name column, and affixed the Defendant’s seal at his own discretion on his name.

The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.

arrow