logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.15 2011가합9130
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Il Construction Co., Ltd.: KRW 873,568,760 and its related thereto from September 4, 2013 to January 15, 2014

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a party. 1) The Dong-gu Daejeon apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") is the plaintiff.

(2) The Defendant Il Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Il Construction”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and the Defendant Korea Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd.”) is a company that entered into a contract for the repair of defects on the instant apartment with Defendant Il Construction.

B. On August 12, 2008, Defendant Japan Construction Co., Ltd. (1) concluded a contract to guarantee the Defendant’s house and the guarantee creditor as the Daejeon Metropolitan City Mayor (Provided, That if the council of occupants’ representatives is constituted, the guarantee creditor shall be deemed to be changed to the council of occupants’ representatives) and issued a guarantee from the guarantee of the Defendant’s house. The detailed details are as follows (hereinafter “instant 1 through 5 guarantee contract”).

(1) The Plaintiff succeeded to the status of the guaranty creditor of this case from August 26, 2008 to August 26, 2008 (1 year) 809,952,852 C 2 C from August 26, 2008 to August 25, 2010 (2 years) 809,952,8523D 3D 2008 from August 26, 2008 to August 25, 2011 (3 years) 1,214,929,2784 E 2784 to August 26, 2008; and the Plaintiff succeeded to the status of the guaranty creditor of this case from August 26, 2008 to August 26, 2008 to August 25, 2008; and on August 26, 2008 to August 26, 2008.

C. After the occupancy of the apartment in this case started, defects such as defect and defect repair cost 1) occurred in the common area and the section for exclusive use of the apartment in this case, each of the above apartment in common areas and the section for exclusive use of the apartment in this case, and the Plaintiff continuously requested the repair of defects from the beginning of the occupancy to the Defendant Il Construction at the request of the occupants.

arrow