The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

around the end of 2007, the Defendant found in the “D Marriage Counseling Center” operated by the victim C located in the fourth floor of the 4th floor in the Seosan City B building at the end of 2007, and even if there was no particular occupation or property, there are many assets for business, and requested marriage brokerage. The Defendant, as the wife of the victim C, knew the victims through the victim E who operated the “E Marriage Counseling Center,” and got the victims informed of the victims, attempted to obtain money by deceiving the victims who are aware of many assets as the business.

1. On June 9, 2008, the accused against the victim F did not have cash found in the front of G in order to put oil in a motor vehicle.

The card was lent, the card was used, and the card was later stated that the credit amount would be repaid.

However, the defendant did not have any property or fixed income at the time, and even if he used a card with the victim's card, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the card price.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained one copy of the national card (the card number: H) from the victim in the seat; and (c) allowed the use of the said card; and (d) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of KRW 5,071,866 using the said card from around that time until July 2008, the Defendant returned the said card to the victim.

2. Around June 12, 2008, the Defendant: (a) sought the victim C from the above “Dock Counseling Center” located on the fourth floor of the building B in Seosan-si, Seosan-si; and (b) stated that “A victim C, who was aware of a large number of property, was a business entity with a large amount of property, has borrowed money; (c) there is a difference in money; (d) the loans will be repaid thereafter; and (e) the loans will be repaid.”

However, since the defendant did not have any property or fixed income at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the victim even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

Defendant 2.