The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although the defendant did not have the face of the victim, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim has consistently been waiting for a clerical error outside the taxi after having reported 112 from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the police was waiting for a clerical error outside the taxi. However, according to the Defendant’s own statement to the purport that he left the taxi, and ② the investigation report (the case of confirmation of the victim’s driver’s shoulder box) is written, according to the Defendant’s statement to the purport that he was booming the victim while taking a bath, and it was recognized that the victim was 112 reported to the victim from the taxi, and that this corresponds to the victim’s statement. ③ The Defendant did not have any fact when she s/he s/ she took a bath while taking a bath about her, and the victim was s/he s/ she did so more than s/ she did so, but the Defendant’s assertion that the victim suffered a bodily injury, as seen above, cannot sufficiently be acknowledged in light of the following facts.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.