beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim reduced by this court, shall be modified as follows:
The defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
1. Presumed factual basis
A. The Plaintiff is a partnership corporation established for the purpose of cultivating, promoting, and wholesale and retail businesses, and D is registered as the Plaintiff’s director as the head of the former representative director E.
B. The Defendants are marital relations, and Defendant C runs freezing foods, processed food wholesale and retail business, etc. with the trade name “F.”
C. From October 17, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendants with virtue and morality.
【Unfounded facts, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings】
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff: (a) totaled KRW 14,781,00 from October 17, 2016 to April 27, 2017 (i.e., KRW 129,129,000 on October 1, 2016; (b) KRW 1,387,000 on December 1, 2016; (c) KRW 4,56,500 on January 4, 2017; (d) KRW 56,500 on February 4, 2017; and (e) supplied the Defendants with KRW 1,387,00 on goods (such as Rad, Dod, etc.) equivalent to KRW 2,848,50 on March 2, 2017; and (e) received reimbursement from the Defendants on April 3, 2016; and (e) received reimbursement from the Defendants.
Therefore, 10,481,00 won for the goods unpaid to the Defendants (=14,781,000 won for the goods - 4,300,000 won for the amount repaid) and damages for delay are claimed against the Defendants.
B. Determination 1) At the first instance court, the Plaintiff 13 submitted the detailed statement of the preparation of the handbook (Evidence 6 of the A) and the handbook (Evidence 13 of the A), and the detailed statement of the handbook (Evidence 6 of the A) constitutes part of the handbook (Evidence 13 of the A) (Evidence 13 of the A). However, at the fifth day of the first instance trial, the Defendants stated that “the handbook of the handbook of the evidence No. 6 of the A is prepared whenever any goods transaction takes place” (the Defendants asserted that “the handbook of the above statement is not the Defendants but the Plaintiff), but the written statement of the pleading is written as above by the Defendants, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the Defendants’ assertion otherwise.
(2) Book Nos. 13 (No. 6-7 of Evidence No. 13) was not submitted with evidence No. 6, but 6-7.