logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단7463
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car to be involved in C options.

On August 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.123% among blood transfusions on August 25, 2017, and led to the driving of the said car at the speed of 0.123% in the direction of the Sinsan City.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes while living well on the front side of the same lane as the victim D (n, 51 years old) and the Echip car driving under the 51 year old, and thus, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in drinking so that the part of the back part of the driver's vehicle was the front part of the car of the defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, 767,538 won of repair expenses were destroyed to the extent that it did not take necessary measures, such as stopping and saving the damaged party, even though it did not break down to the extent of 767,538 won.

Defendant continued to flee by driving the said car as above, and continued to turn to the left at the right speed of G private distance in the direction of the 2nd direction from the lot direction on the same day, around 02:41 on the same day.

At the time, the passenger car driven by the victim H(39 tax) on the right side of the defendant's moving direction at the time was under a new line. Thus, the defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system while well-grounded on the new and front left side.

Nevertheless, the defendant.

arrow