1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The plaintiffs sought revocation of the imposition of each penalty points stated in the purport of the claim against the defendant, and the judgment of the court of first instance cited only 3, 4, and 5 of the [Attachment 1] list, and dismissed the remaining claims as to 1, 2.

Accordingly, only the plaintiffs appeal against the above dismissal part, so this Court's judgment is limited to the cancellation claim of the above 1 and 2 disposition.

2. The grounds for this part of the disposition by the court are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(However, it is possible to delete the entry "Seo-gu" in Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 3. Whether each disposition of this case is legitimate or not.

A. The plaintiffs' assertion and the grounds for this part of the relevant law are as stated in each corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from the last day of the judgment of the court of first instance, from the third day to the third day, from the fourth to the fourth day, from the fourth to the fifth day, and from the second day), and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

B. 1) Determination 1) Article 87(5) [Attachment 8] [Attachment 8] of the Enforcement Decree of the Construction Technology Promotion Act, delegated by Article 53(1) and (4) of the Construction Technology Promotion Act, as to whether the construction of a fire partition facility installed before the fire partition resistant shock is installed

In addition, subparagraph 5 (b) (1) of the attached Table of this case provides that "other cases where the planning process has been interrupted due to the omission or delay in the inspection of the degree of fault," the construction project management service provider and construction project management engineer shall be imposed "one point".

In full view of the contents and images of the evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the apartment construction of this case is related to the purpose of the entire pleadings.