The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) considering the following: (b) the confession of the crime, the fact that the Defendant’s actual gains are not relatively large compared to the amount of damage; (c) the fact that the Defendant partially repaid the amount of damage to the Defendant; and (d) the fact that the Defendant, an accomplice, could exercise his influence over the management of the school foundationF, by deceiving the victim as if he could exercise his influence over the management of the school foundation; and (e) the fact that the Defendant did not have repaid the damage to the victim; and (e) the Defendant did not reach an agreement, the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.