1. The payment order for the loan case between D Co., Ltd. and the Defendants is the Seoul Central District Court 2016Hu27218.

D) On February 17, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court applied for a payment order seeking a loan against the Defendants to the said Seoul Central District Court. The payment order (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 tea27218; hereinafter “instant payment order”) stating that “the Defendants jointly and severally paid to D Co., Ltd. 4,849,058,227 won and 2,104,930,376 won per annum 25% from January 23, 2016 to the date of complete payment.” The payment order of this case was issued to the Defendants Company B on April 18, 2017, and it is evident that the Defendants received the notice of assignment of assets from each of the Defendants Co., Ltd. 2 and the notice of assignment of assets from each of the Defendants Co., Ltd. on May 18, 2016, and the Plaintiff did not receive the notice of assignment of assets from each of the Defendants Co., Ltd. 19, 2016.

According to these facts, the officer of the Seoul Central District Court shall grant the succeeding execution clause for compulsory execution by the judgment of this case to the plaintiff who is the successor to whom the claim for the payment order of this case against the defendants was acquired from D Co., Ltd. pursuant to Article 31 of the Civil Execution Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.