logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.21 2018가단2077
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiff (appointed party).

(a) the first floor of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 1, 2, .

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 30, 2006, the Defendant: (a) purchased the above real estate from C on September 14, 2017; (b) on June 30, 2006, KRW 12 months from June 30, 2006, KRW 19 million, and KRW 1750,000 per month (hereinafter “1 rental contract”); (c) purchased the pertinent real estate from C on September 14, 2017; and (d) concluded a lease contract with the Defendant on November 30, 2017, on the ground that the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) purchased the said real estate from 00,000 won; and (e) concluded the lease contract with the Defendant on November 30, 2017, the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff et al.”) notified the Defendant of the fact that the lease contract was terminated on the ground that the lease contract was terminated on October 31, 2017.

E. However, the Defendant did not pay the deposit even after the conclusion of the two lease contracts, and thus, the Plaintiff, etc. requested the Defendant to pay the deposit several times, but failed to receive it.

F. On June 28, 2018, an application for modification of the purport of the instant claim and the cause of the claim, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the two lease contract on the grounds of the failure to pay the above deposit, etc., was served on the Defendant

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-3 evidence, purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the 1 and 2 lease contract was lawfully terminated on the grounds that the Defendant did not pay the rent or the payment of the deposit, and thus, the Defendant is the Plaintiff.

arrow