A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and four years of imprisonment with prison labor for special damage, etc. at Daejeon District Court on February 12, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

1. The term "C" is a criminal organization organized by around September 1987 by around D, E, F, and G, etc. to neglect amusement establishments in the vicinity of the Dong-gu in Gwangju, Dong-gu. Around September 1987, "H located in the Dong-gu," which is a second class leader leading the members of the above E, a terminal rank assisting the above two titles, a person who is an assistant officer of the behavior group managing the above G, the above D as an assistant officer of the behavior group managing the members of the above group, and the above Eul as a superior's leader of the behavior group participating in the behavior according to the superior's instructions, and "on the boat, the 90 road bend, the 90 road bend, the response of the vessel shall be complied with without any condition, and if the opposing forces are involved in the activity area, the person who responded to the organization without any condition.

An organization consisting of several crimes provided for in the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, such as breathing the person to be engaged in entertainment business in Japan, through violence and intimidation, while engaging in activities under the order of behavior with the content of "."

The Defendant knew that “C” was an organization constituted with a view to various crimes prescribed by the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, the Defendant, at the end of May 2014, expressed his intention to join the said organization by introducing L, which is a constituent element of the organization, and joined the said organization.

2. Around October 19, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual special injury by organizations, etc.), decided that the so-called “M” and the so-called “M” were “M” and the so-called “M”, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant et al. tried to assault the “C” group of the “M” staff N, while engaging in a dispute with the “M” staff N; and (b) N expressed desire.