logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.11.06 2014고정950
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 13, 2014, the Defendant was a person engaging in driving of Crick Vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Vehicle”), and driven the above vehicle at around 08:25 on March 13, 2014, and made the two-lane road at the speed of 8-10 no. 51-o, Seocheon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to turn to the left at the right right in the direction of the Dricking Security Center.

Since there is a cross-section where signal apparatus is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed for a person engaged in driving the vehicle, keeping the front side and the right and the right of the vehicle well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and obstructed the course of the victim D(34 years old) drive E Sp-on vehicle (hereinafter “victimed vehicle”) in the opposite direction by negligence in violation of the signal and caused the victim to suffer from an accident, and caused the victim to have a pedestrian signal installed in the front part of the damaged vehicle to have the pedestrian signal installed in the front part of the damaged vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as brain salvin, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant is driving his/her vehicle to turn to the left at the above intersection, and the vehicle was stopped by reporting that the damaged vehicle enters the intersection in the speed above, and the point where the vehicle stopped does not obstruct the passage of the damaged vehicle, and the victim is the defendant vehicle.

arrow