A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 9. 12. 05:10 경 경남 양산시 양산 역 6길 27에 있는 양산 소방서 중부 119 소방 센터 앞 도로에서, 피고인이 일행과 시비하는 것을 목격한 E의 신고를 받고 출동한 경남 양산 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경찰관 순경 G과 경사 H으로부터 사건 경위에 대한 질문을 받자 “ 너 몇 살이고, 씨 팔새끼야, 내가 뭘 잘못 했노, 신고한 사람 나오라, 개새끼 ”라고 소리치며 순경 G의 가슴을 툭툭 치고, 순경 G과 경사 H으로부터 피고인을 현행범으로 체포하겠다는 말을 듣자 순경 G의 가슴을 2~3 회 힘껏 밀치고, 경사 H의 얼굴에 주먹을 치켜들어 겨누며 " 너 두고 보자, 시 팔새끼야 "라고 말하며 위협하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, H and G;

1. A written statement of the main officer;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for confirmation of facts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The defense counsel regarding the defendant's assertion of defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, and the defendant's act is a legitimate defense against his/her unlawful performance of duties, such as H and G

or the defendant committed the principal crime under the mental and physical weakness of alcohol.

The argument is asserted.

According to each of the above evidence, the defendant thought that two persons were scambling, E, etc. at the time and place in the ruling, and reported to the police, and reported to the police, and the police officer H, G, etc. were called out, and the defendant took a bath to E, and scam the part of the police officer's scambling, and thereafter, the police officer who the defendant tried to separate E from the defendant.