1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 328,426,219; and (b) KRW 3,00,000; and (c) KRW 1,00,000 for the Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 3, 2012, at around 06:30, G 1 ton blobbbbs (hereinafter “fluors”) and, at around 06:30 on October 3, 2012, F was driven by the front part of the HPoter 1 ton (hereinafter “victim”) left side of the HPoter 1 ton of the freight (hereinafter “victim”) which was the opposite lane by breaking the central line of the yellow solid line, while driving a one-way blobscing road near the fluent road in the vicinity of the Hansung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, the upper part of the GPobsp. (hereinafter “victim”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

As a result of the instant accident, F, a driver of a household driving vehicle, died, and the Plaintiff A, a driver of a damaged vehicle, suffered injury, such as an injury to the left-hand left-hand pelle, the upper pelle, etc.

C. The plaintiff B is the spouse of the plaintiff A, and the plaintiff C and D are their children, and the defendant is the insurer of the damage vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-5, 10 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident in this case as the insurer of a sea-going vehicle.

B. As to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant argues that there was negligence that the Plaintiff could not take such measures despite the Plaintiff’s failure to avoid or faithfully engage in medical treatment using a hole of up to 4.12 meters wide on the right side of the damaged vehicle, and that since the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage, the Defendant’s liability to compensate for damages or the part corresponding to the Plaintiff’s fault ratio out of the direct non-treatment cost already paid by the Defendant for the said Plaintiff should be deducted.

The following circumstances, i.e., the evidence mentioned above, and the result of the court’s commission for physical examination and supplementation of I hospital, which may be recognized as follows: