logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.10.08 2015고단312
사기
Text

Defendant

AC’s imprisonment of two years and six months, Defendant AD’s imprisonment of two years and four months, Defendant B, C’s imprisonment of six months, and Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

AC was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on September 27, 2012, and on September 11, 2013, it is currently under the period of repeated crime as of September 11, 2013.

In the Gwangju District Court on July 2, 2015, the defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and eight months, one year and two months, one year and two months, and one year and six months, and the defendant D was sentenced to imprisonment, and is still pending in the appellate trial.

The Defendants are members of the so-called Bosing criminal organization, which defrauds money from many and unspecified persons in order to enable them to obtain a loan by misrepresenting them to the employees of financial institutions by making phone calls to many and unspecified persons, and the members of the above criminal organization, including the Defendants, participated in the crime by dividing their roles such as the total amount of liability, management responsibilities, inducements, and withdrawals.

Defendant

AC’s role in the collection, supervision, management, etc. of the withdrawals after the interview to the Daegu regional withdrawals, and the role of Defendant AD to receive and deliver the proceeds of the crime from the bank, which is the subordinate withdrawals, A and D, to the money exchange; Defendant A received a cash card from the upper-board AC with the order of the victims to withdraw the cash deposited from the account connected with the cash card; Defendant A again received the cash card from Defendant D and K, and then sent the cash again to the above upper-tier B with the cash withdrawn by Defendant D and K; Defendant B, upon the Defendant’s attitude to Defendant A and the Defendant D and K, sent the cash again to the above upper-tier B; Defendant C connected with the aforementioned tasks to enable the exchange of cash and cash cards, etc. as seen above; Defendant C and the nearest location and location of the cash delivery to Defendant D and K, respectively. Defendant C’s role in withdrawing the cash from the lower-tier D and K’s front location.

arrow