Defendant

B The Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,00,000, and a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Criminal facts

(C) Defendant B is the actual operator of Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “E”) who is a private party to the execution of the apartment unit D, Hongsung-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant C as the representative director of the E, was in charge of the above apartment unit sale management, etc. according to the direction of Defendant B. Defendant A is a person in charge of the affairs such as the conclusion of the sales contract upon request of E for the sale and lease of apartment units

The above D apartment was in progress by approximately 70 households among the 250 households, and the remaining households were also unable to sell them normally due to the establishment of the right to collateral security. In particular, on November 21, 2013, the Daejeon District Court rendered a decision to commence compulsory auction with respect to the above apartment F (hereinafter “the instant household”).

Defendant

A As above, since the household of this case is designated as the non-household, even if it receives money from the applicant for occupancy as the sale price, even though it is not possible to complete the registration of the transfer of ownership to the household of this case, the victim G who was found in the above D apartment sales office on December 2, 2013 and was found to sell in lots at the above D apartment sales office, will sell the household of this case to the party upon the payment of the sale price.

“.....”

Accordingly, the injured party entered into the instant sales contract with Defendant A for the instant household (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and Defendant A reported that the instant sales contract was entered into with Defendant B and C around January 7, 2014, and Defendant B and C conspired to continue the instant sales contract without the intent or ability to complete the registration of transfer of ownership to the instant household because the decision to commence compulsory auction was made with respect to the instant household.

After all, Defendant B and C conspired as above, and deceptions the victim, and their deceivings from the victim.