logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.02.05 2013고정3027
존속상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

As the children of the victim B, the Defendant is siblings with the victim C, the victim D, the victim E, and the victim F.

1. Around 14:00 on August 18, 2010, the Defendant was found to have a property problem in the house of the victim B (the age of 81), born in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and demanded the victim to return to the victim's property two times, and the victim's knife with the second floor of the hand-on, and continuously putting the kitchen 20cm (the day length 20cm) which had been held in advance, and putting the room on the floor, the Defendant called "I am off," "I am off," "I am", "I am," and "I am off, I am off the floor of the ward."

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim B of his mother-child, such as a freshion of a fresh, a fresh of a fresh, or a fresh of a fresh of a fresh, which requires treatment for about six weeks.

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property by putting a teahouse of a size of 150,000 won owned by the injured party C (Nam, 59 years old) on the same date, time, and place as that of paragraph (1).

3. Intimidation.

A. On December 2010, the Defendant: (a) called H to the victim D (e.g., 56 years of age) who was a victim of the case of property inheritance in the area of the Sinjin-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) called H on the issue of property inheritance; (c) “I will throw away the knife in the knife”; (d) “I am in the knife, I am in the knife, I am in the knife, I am in the knife; and (e) threatened the victim by informing the victim of the harm.

B. At around 12:10 on 24:201, the Defendant: (a) was a mobile phone (I) of F (Nam, South, 39 years of age) (i) his/her birth, his/her birth, “I,” and “I,” due to the lack of “I, I,” and “I,” for the following reasons: (b) the Defendant was not able to take part in the property of J; and (c) the Defendant was not able to take part in the property of J; and (d) the Defendant was not able to take part in “I,” respectively.

arrow