1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 33,618,00, and 5% per annum from November 1, 2015 to August 11, 2016, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff (MMMTT) is a company that engages in the manufacture, manufacture, and sale of a multi-kicker steel plate, etc., and the Defendant is a company that engages in the business of manufacturing and selling iron plates and steel plates. The Defendant is a company that engages in the business of manufacturing and selling steel plates and steel plates.

B. At around September 2013, Taesung E. S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S. company”) requested the Defendant to process an amount equivalent to 26,515kg (3,618,000 won at the market price after the completion of the process; hereinafter “the instant goods”) of GI 7 cm GI’s strong knific knific GI 7 knific knific knific knific knific knife, and the Defendant was under storage at the Defendant’s factory located in Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun.

C. On March 2014, the Plaintiff purchased the instant goods from Nonparty Company in KRW 31,818,000, and notified the Defendant of the purchase.

Accordingly, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff documents on the current status of clinical processing, details of clinical processing costs and tax invoices (for claims) by e-mail. On March 31, 2014, the Defendant claimed for the payment of KRW 887,370 to the Plaintiff, and on April 30, 2014, the Plaintiff paid the said processing cost to the Defendant.

On the other hand, C, an employee of the Defendant, disposed of the instant goods on five occasions from January 3, 2014 to May 8, 2014, using the fact that the instant goods were kept continuously in the Defendant’s factory.

On July 10, 2014, the representative D of the Defendant filed a complaint seeking criminal punishment on the premise that the instant goods are owned by the Plaintiff, under the premise that C arbitrarily sold the instant goods and used the sales proceeds for personal purposes.

C On November 26, 2015, at the Cheongju District Court (2015 Godan1733), he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for eight months after being found to have committed the above crime.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 8, Eul evidence 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. A false contract acceptance as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim is made.