A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant selected several insurance products with a high level of guarantee and, rather than for the purpose of receiving insurance proceeds, such as hospitalization expenses and medical expenses, for the purpose of receiving insurance proceeds, rather than for treatment, the Defendant did not receive proper hospitalized treatment while frequently staying out or staying out at a hospital which is easy to be hospitalized with respect to a disease that can sufficiently be treated, or, even if the disease requires hospital treatment, after receiving long-term hospitalized treatment more than necessary, submitted relevant documents necessary for receiving insurance proceeds, such as a certificate of hospitalization, a medical certificate, etc., stating that he/she had undergone proper hospitalized treatment from the relevant hospital at the time of discharge, and submitted them to each insurance company that had already subscribed

On November 10, 2008, the Defendant entered into an insurance contract with the victim Dong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. and the insured A, the insured, the monthly insurance premium of KRW 85,000.

After entering into an insurance contract as above, the Defendant was diagnosed by the “D Hospital” located in the Busan Metropolitan City captain C, and was hospitalized for 11 days from that time until August 12, 2013 after being diagnosed by the “D Hospital” located in the Busan Metropolitan City captain C, and was hospitalized for 11 days from that time.

However, the above disease was sufficiently treated by the hospital. The purpose of receiving insurance proceeds, such as hospitalization expenses and medical expenses, was to be hospitalized by the insurance company that had already joined the hospital. According to the content of the treatment during the period of hospitalization, the doctor prescribed that the medical doctor shall undergo 30 times the active test (the blood pressure, beer, respiratory, and physical temperature). However, the 23 times of the determination was not recorded or recorded as “in the absence,” and there was no fact that the eight-time prescription for physical therapy was implemented, and it was substantially limited to the outpatient treatment due to the prolonged outing or staying outside of the hospital during the above hospitalization period.

Nevertheless, the defendant around August 13, 2013.