A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2017, at around 16:30 on August 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from a general restaurant of “E” operated by the victim D (n, 25 years of age) in the East Sea C; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: (c) flasing the customers who provide meals at the same place without the influence of alcohol; (d) flasing the victims to stop it; and (e) flasing the victims to die

“Acking the disturbance, the father of the above victim, and demanding the defendant to leave the F(52 tax) as the father of the above victim, “Acking the funeral to go to the head of the Dong, so he will throw away the Chewing death as well as the head of the household.”

“A sound, etc.” has difficulty in noise for 1 hour and 53 minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the road in front of a general restaurant of “E” located in “E” in “E” in the East Sea, which was reported by 112 and sent out by customers after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant was demanded to return home from H (V, 30 years of age) belonging to the G District of the Dong Police Station in the East Sea Police Station, and on the above H, the Defendant was forced to go home from the police officer belonging to “on the back of the police station, the female police officer is not the same.”

Babk Bab

“Along with the highest noise, as such, threatened the above H by drinking, and as a consequence, the right edge of the H was assaulted by walking the upper right edge of the H in a number of times.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with H’s legitimate execution of duties, which performs the 112 reported mobilization work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of eight-dimensional Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV image course;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The fact that the defendant had been already punished twice for the same crime for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in which the period of probation expires due to the same crime.