1. The amount remaining after deducting the costs of auction from the proceeds of the auction attached to the 1st new real estate in the annexed list.

Attached Form

The facts in the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties, or each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 may be acknowledged respectively by viewing the whole purport of the pleadings.

In full view of all the circumstances shown in the argument of this case, such as the location, size, use status, value of use after the division, the relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the attitude in which the Plaintiff and the Defendants appear as to the division of the real estate in the attached Table 1, and the size of the land corresponding to the share of the Plaintiff and the Defendants, which are shown in the attached Table 1 as shown in the argument of this case, it constitutes a case where the real estate in the attached Table 1 is unable to be divided in kind in kind or it is likely to be significantly reduced if it is divided in kind.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by dividing the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the sale price by attaching the attached list 1 re-real estate to the auction sale price, by the proportion of each share of the plaintiff and the defendants.