A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23:35, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the head of C in front of the 1112-round 23:35,000-si, and said that E would pay the drinking value and return home to the taxi after getting out of the taxi; (b) the Defendant attempted to get out of the patrol vehicle by putting the patrol vehicle back; and (c) the said E attempted to get out of the patrol vehicle, stating, “I would like to get out of the patrol vehicle when I pay taxes, I would like to get out of the patrol vehicle.” (d) The Defendant pushed out the said E three times with both hand, and threatened the above E with the face of the said E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes by assaulting E- which belongs to the Jeoncheon Police Station D District.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the coercion of official duties (special sponser] (in the event that there is a heavy penalty, but an unexpected injury occurs, it shall be regarded as a general sponser] basic area [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months;

2. The crime of this case in which the sentence of sentence was determined is a final and conclusive payment of the drinking value, and a police official soliciting a police official to return home to the taxi on and off the taxi, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the fact that the defendant shows a profound attitude against his mistake and again does not repeat the crime, that the defendant suffers from a yellow disorder, that there is no criminal history exceeding the fine, and that there is no other defendant.