The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant's wrongness is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case prevents the victim's restaurant business by drinking about 40 minutes while being drunk in the restaurant of the victimized person. In light of the contents of the crime, the attitude of the defendant's act, and the duration, time, degree, etc. of the obstruction of business, etc., the crime of this case is not less complicated, and there was no agreement with the victim or the restoration of damage until now.

There are a number of criminal penalties against the accused, including criminal records.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.