logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.06.29 2016고단1541
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 15, 2016, the Defendant, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the drinking value within the “hop” operated by the victim C at the time of light lighting around 19:10 on May 15, 2016, the Defendant was provided with the said victim with alcohol and food equivalent to KRW 35,000, including KRW 2 Byung (8,000), Sick C C C C C C C C C C C C C (12,00,000, and then acquired the said victim with the said victim’s alcohol and food.

2. On May 15, 2016, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties would be unable to perform funeral services from the internal date, as a matter of payment of the drinking value within the said head office around 20:00.

Along to approximately 20 minutes of disturbance, such as flaging the victim's shoulder with his/her hand and flaging the victim's shoulder, the victim interfered with the victim's head-flag operation.

3. On May 15, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who received a report of disturbance 112 while drunking a disturbance at the front of the above heading on May 15, 2016, and received a report of disturbance 112 at the site, and received a request for confirmation of returning home and status from the slope E belonging to the Gibscoping Police Station D commander called to the site.

What is the inside of the country;

This son, a camping-style son, a few times of age, this son’s age,” and assaulted E by putting the left arms of E in his hand into his hand, making E depict and bat off, and having E depict, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of field photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the nature of each of the crimes in this case is somewhat minor.

arrow