A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On April 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on August 3, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gangseo Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on August 3, 2015. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on November 2, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 20, 2016, the Defendant ordered the victim’s alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol to the victim, as if he would pay the alcohol value, at the E amusement shop operated by the victim D in Dongducheon-si, 2016.

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc. because he did not possess only KRW 60,00 in the number, and he did not have a able credit card.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired the alcohol and service equivalent to the total market value of 660,000 won from the victim.

2. Between March 20, 2016 and March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported that the female employees in the place of drinking alcohol at the above amusement shop drinking alcohol without drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol in drinking alcohol; and (b) reported that he/she “Ispath, pathn, and dyspathn,” sees that the female employees are drinking alcohol at the above entertainment shop.

"Absing the desire of ", etc.," and absing the glass strings into the singing machine direction, etc.

Therefore, when the victim demanded that "the calculation of the drinking value" be made by the victim, the defendant was able to see the beer's disease on the floor by cutting the beer who was on a table, broken it on the floor, cut it, and sound, and even if the defendant received the demand from the victim of the second damage to "do not calculate the drinking value, so it would be good that it would be difficult to calculate the drinking value," the defendant continued to take a bath, sound, and did not go at the above main point.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Simplified receipts:

1. Business license;

1. On-site photographs and photographs;

1. Judgment.