1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff is the Defendant’s registrant.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Basic Facts

A. The defendant is a church belonging to B religious organizations, and the plaintiff is a person who was a registered teacher of the defendant.

B. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant opened a trial against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant judgment”) and received education on the distribution activities from a group D, which is a group of D, and was engaged in activities to change the trend of infiltration to the Defendant and capture D, and made a registration expulsion and a withdrawal disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff promoted in order to cause incompetuity between the church and the members.

C. Of the Ordinance on the Disciplinary Powers of the Religious Organizations General Meeting (hereinafter “The Ordinance on the Disciplinary Powers”) applied to the instant disposition, the contents pertaining to the instant case are as follows.

Article 20 If the patriarches a trial meeting, the chairman first promulgates the reason and declares a full handling of the case, and then reads the complaint and the explanatory note on the crime, and if the original defendant petition for postponement without wanting to be examined at the party meeting, it shall be limited to the following several cases.

1. To deliver to the defendant a complaint and a description of evidence of the crime (the name and degree of the witness in detail of each Article shall be recorded);

2. He/she shall issue a writ of summons to the original defendant and persons concerned to attend the next meeting (ten days or more);

3. A writ of summons shall contain the name of the sub-committee and the chairman’s seal and seal shall be affixed to the writ of summons of Article 21, if the sub-committee fails to deliver it to the principal, and if it is impossible to deliver it to the principal, it shall be served to the last dwelling place, and there shall be sufficient evidence of food service before opening.

Article 24 above shall be dealt with in the following order after setting the opening date in order to hold a trial and giving notice of the formality to the original defendant:

1. A witness shall be examined by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff may respectively replace the witness of the plaintiff with the witness of the plaintiff, and other legitimate evidence may be submitted.

2. Subsequent to this, the plaintiff or the defendant may present a new witness or a new evidence only in order to reflect evidence.