A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around March 6, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven a BP car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.177% while under the influence of alcohol on March 6, 2020, and driven a two-lane road back to and back from Jinju City along the two-lane road from D apartment side to E apartment.

At the time, it is at night and at the same time an intersection where traffic control is not performed, so the speed has been reduced or temporarily suspended, and there was a duty of care to check whether a vehicle is being entered the intersection first and to drive safely by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in entering the intersection without examining the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the part of Gyststa taxi’s right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F, such as duplicating and closing the cuplic cuplic at approximately five weeks of unknown treatment, and at the same time suffered injury to the victim H (20 years of age) who was accompanied by the taxi for about four weeks of treatment.

2. On November 14, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch as of November 14, 2016.

The Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.177% from the 2km section to the front road of the same city in front of the mutual influence road at the beginning of the early border of paragraph (1) at the time.

Accordingly, the prohibition of drinking driving was violated not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Each traffic accident report, each photograph, and each diagnosis report;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and notification on the control of drinking driving;