A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on May 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 23:00, while drunked “D” restaurant operated in Suwon-si C, and took cash by drinking alcohol while drinking; (b) and (c) scrinkf belonging to the Suwon-gu Police Station Eab box sent to C upon receiving a report on his/her bath to perform the case, and confirmed the circumstances of the case, the Defendant: (a) she saw F to read “I saw, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, e.g., see, e., e., g., 3-4 smuggling of F’s shoulder; and (c) 5-6 times of his/her breast body on drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning F's criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the defendant with reasons for sentencing choice of imprisonment, and the court provided the defendant an opportunity by taking into account that the defendant's reflective and contingent crimes were committed, however, a sentence of imprisonment is inevitable in light of the fact that the defendant

However, according to the recommendation of the full bench, the punishment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the police officer complained against the police officer and the defendant acknowledges the facts of the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.