logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.13 2014나2028075
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the changed claim in exchange between the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties, etc.) The Plaintiff is a mutual educational institute called “DPublic Announcement Private Teaching Institutes” (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”).

(2) From August 2005, the Defendant was in charge of the electrical and electronic communication appointment lecture (hereinafter “instant appointment lecture”) and the U.S. Professional Engineer lecture (hereinafter “the instant professional engineer lecture”), using the name “E” from the instant educational institute operated by the Plaintiff from August 2005 to be an instructor, and was in charge of the management affairs, etc. (hereinafter “each of the instant lectures”).

B. Around December 2006, the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the use of a leased vehicle, etc. 1) signed between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on the lease contract between the Plaintiff and the lessee, and then the Defendant would use the leased vehicle (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(2) On December 2006, C representing the Plaintiff was changed to EL branch card Co., Ltd. and thereafter changed to the new card Co., Ltd. according to the instant agreement.

(2) On January 2, 2007, the Plaintiff provided documents necessary for the automobile lease contract, including the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression, and on January 2, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into an automobile lease contract with the lessee, the lessee, the lessee, the lease deposit amount of KRW 2093,00,00,000, and the monthly lease amount of KRW 44 months, and the monthly lease amount of KRW 2,414,120 (hereinafter “the first lease contract”). On the same day, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,000,000 to the EL branch card pursuant to the Plaintiff’s bank account.

From January 2, 2007, the Defendant used the instant first vehicle that was shipped out pursuant to the instant first lease agreement.

arrow