1. Defendant B’s 130 million won to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 8, 2005 to August 31, 2008.

1. Indication of claim;

A. Defendant B: Claim for the extension of the extinctive prescription of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, which was confirmed by the Reconciliation Recommendation Order dated June 18, 2008, in the damages case involving Suwon District Court Branch 2007Gahap6792

B. Defendant C: Claim for the extension of extinctive prescription of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C, which was confirmed by the Seoul High Court’s conciliation protocol on April 1, 2009, in the damages case 2008Na90981

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(b) Defendant C: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)