Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant is too uncompared and unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the prosecutor is too uncompared and unreasonable.

2. In short, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even during the period of repeated crime due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes against the Defendant more than 40 times. In addition, the Defendant did not agree with G, who is the victim of the instant crime of interference with business, and thus, sought punishment against the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s act unfavorable to the Defendant and the Defendant’s act of violation (see, e.g., Supreme Court’s summons through several times, and the Defendant did not attend the court of the lower court’s summons). However, the lower court’s judgment is unreasonable or unreasonable, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) while the Defendant was found in the trial, such as the grounds for appeal, rebuttal, and legal statement, the victim of the instant crime of interference with business, and D, who is the victim of the instant crime of fraud, did not want the punishment against each of the Defendant; and (b) the circumstance and details of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation, and occupation conditions indicated in the records.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.