The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (in 6 months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected, and that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant in light of all the circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions of the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, etc., the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable since the sentence of the defendant's unfair sentencing of the defendant is too inappropriate, since the defendant's assertion of the defendant's unjust sentencing is not justified, since the defendant's crime of this case was committed by providing game water different from the rating classification in violation of the purpose of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry which aims to establish a healthy game culture for the promotion of the game industry and to exchange the result obtained through the use of game products.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.