logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.04.30 2018고단1559
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 08:40 on March 26, 2018, the Defendant expressed that the victim D (the 54 years old, the 28 years old, and the 28 years old) and the victim E (the 28 years old) are wrong to drive the Defendant on the road in front of C latter part of Dobonggu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and subsequently, the Defendant got the victim E from the top of a car operation, and the victim D gets the victim's arms above the floor by pushing the Defendant's arms, and caused the victim D to inflict an injury, such as the mouth at the bottom of the right frame in need of treatment for about 6 weeks, and around 2 weeks to the victim E, such as the catum salt, tension, tension, etc.

(A) The victim E stated in the investigative agency and the court that he was injured by his head and falbage before and after the time when the defendant gets in his vehicle. However, according to the evidence, the summary of the evidence can be acknowledged that the victim E, who was on board the head of the vehicle, flabed into the body against her will, brought the victim E, who was on board the flab in the flab, and the fact that the flab was damaged by flab in the process. However, the defendant cannot be recognized

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The entry of witnesses D and E in the third protocol of the trial, the entry of witnesses F in the fifth protocol of the trial, the entry of witnesses G in the seventh protocol of the trial;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is that the defendant has no other criminal record than twice a fine by 2012, and that the victims have seriously expressed their desire to commit the instant crime appears to have provided a critical reason for the occurrence of the instant crime. The Defendant, on March 29, 2019, considered victim D as the victim as the victim on the basis of the compensation for damages.

arrow