All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant C’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant guilty of this case’s charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. As to Defendant D’s final appeal, Defendant D did not submit a written reason for final appeal within the period for submission of the written reason for final appeal, and Defendant D did not indicate the grounds for final appeal in the final appeal.

3. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the grounds for appeal by Defendants A, B, and E in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the Defendants were guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by exceeding the bounds of

4. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.