beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the selective claims of the plaintiff and the succeeding intervenor added in the trial, shall be as follows:
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 28, 2010, the Plaintiff and D (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”) agreed to lease the entire building on the E and F ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) of the leased deposit amounting to KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 900,000, and the term of lease from October 28, 2010 to January 10, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”). At that time, the Defendants handed over the said building to the Defendants.
B. The instant building has been used as a PC prior to the conclusion of the instant lease agreement. Defendant B had completed business registration with the content of “GPC bank, type of business: service business, category of business: PC bank, and type: PC bank” at the Dong office of the Dong Office around January 25, 201, and continued the PC business in the instant building along with Defendant C.
C. On January 14, 2013, January 18, 2013, and March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants a certificate of content that the instant lease agreement expired due to the expiration of the period of January 10, 2013, and that the delivery of the said building was completed by April 10, 2013, and each of the above contents certification reached the Defendants around that time.
On March 21, 2013, the Defendants sent to the Plaintiff a certificate of content that the Defendants would use the instant building by January 10, 2016 under the Commercial Building Lease Act, and the said certificate reached the Plaintiff around that time.
E. On September 17, 2013, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants a certificate of contents demanding the delivery of the said building, and the said certificate reached the Defendants around that time.
F. On September 26, 2013 and October 1, 2013, the Defendants sent to the Plaintiff a proof of the content that the instant lease agreement, which was legally renewed until January 10, 2014, requires renewal. Each of the above content certification reached the Plaintiff around that time.
G. The Plaintiff was in the process of trial.